A Comedic Look at Ethical Dilemmas in Junior Achievement: The Double-Bookkeeping Incident
In the realm of professional conduct, it’s not uncommon to find ourselves navigating morally ambiguous situations. Reflecting on my own experiences, one incident from my early career stands out not just for its ethical implications, but for its surprising hilarity.
During my time mentoring a Junior Achievement team comprised of high school students in their second and third years, we faced the task of setting up and running a miniature business. Our venture? Selling fruit baskets. The students would purchase bulk fruit and baskets, assemble the products, and then deliver them across our local community. It seemed straightforward—until we encountered the challenges posed by Junior Achievement’s strict guidelines, particularly the prohibition on incurring debt.
While it’s understandable that these regulations were intended to safeguard the organization, they presented a real-world dilemma: how could we finance the procurement of fruit without incurring liabilities? Without the option to take on debt, we were left scratching our heads. That’s when we devised a workaround that straddled an ethical line.
To sidestep these restrictions, we asked customers to prepay for their orders. We collected payments upon order receipt, which allowed us to fund our fruit purchases. From a business strategy standpoint, it was effective—our operations were thriving, and we were meeting the community’s demand for fresh fruit baskets.
However, the real comedic twist of this story emerged when it came time to create our financial reports for submission to Junior Achievement’s office. We knew that reporting our cash collections and deferred revenue would raise red flags, potentially leading to disapproval from the organization. Yet, in order to function effectively, we needed to maintain accurate records of who had paid us and which baskets were outstanding.
This necessity led to the unintentional creation of a double-entry Bookkeeping system. To keep everything straight, we established two sets of records: one for our internal use (the “real” books) and a second set meant solely for the eyes of Junior Achievement, which would essentially be “audited” during their review.
After several weeks, we jokingly acknowledged the absurdity of maintaining two sets of books, realizing the irony of the situation. We collectively decided to ride it out since our project was nearing its conclusion and everything had been running smoothly.
In hindsight, while this experience was tinged with a comedic edge, it raises crucial questions about the lengths to which we might go to comply with rules we perceive as
No responses yet