Reflecting on Unconventional Ethics: A Journey Through Junior Achievement
In the realm of career development, we often stumble upon situations that challenge our ethical boundaries. Here’s a lighthearted yet thought-provoking account from my experience mentoring a local Junior Achievement team during my time as an associate.
Our adventure began when a small group of 2nd and 3rd year associates volunteered to mentor high school students in developing a business concept. The task was simple: our team had to create and operate a small business for a few months. After brainstorming various ideas, we settled on selling fruit baskets—an initiative we believed would not only be fun but also teach valuable business skills to the students.
The premise was straightforward: purchase fruit in bulk, assemble attractive baskets, and deliver them to customers’ homes in the community. However, we soon encountered a significant hurdle imposed by Junior Achievement’s guidelines: the business could not incur any debt. While this rule was well-intentioned and aimed at protecting the organization, it created a peculiar predicament.
How could we buy inventory without upfront capital? And how could we secure funds without creating any liabilities? The answer was not immediately obvious, and after some brainstorming, we devised a workaround. We would ask customers to prepay for the fruit baskets upon ordering. This approach allowed us to generate revenue before incurring any financial obligation to purchase the fruit—a classic case of creative problem-solving.
Here’s where things took an unexpected turn, adding a humorous twist to our ethical compass. Each week, we were tasked with preparing financial reports for submission to the Junior Achievement office. In a moment of clarity—albeit one that inspired more laughter than concern—we realized that showing our actual cash collections and deferred revenue would likely result in serious fallout from the organization.
To sidestep this predicament, we unwittingly established two sets of financial records: one that reflected our true operations, and another tailored for our official submissions, which our young protégés were in on. This dual Accounting system became our little secret; we called it the “real” set of books and the “submission” set.
Rather amusingly, after a few weeks, we had a collective epiphany that we were maintaining two distinct ledgers—one for internal tracking and one sanitized for external review. Given our project’s impending conclusion, we opted to continue down this unconventional path rather than risk unraveling the progress we had made.
This experience was not merely a comic interlude in our professional
No responses yet