The Curious Case of Ethical Flexibility in a Business Simulation
In the realm of professional development, we often come across intriguing scenarios that challenge our moral compass. A recent experience shared by a group of dedicated associates sheds light on the hilarious yet ethically questionable situations that can arise during mentoring programs.
The associates, primarily in their second and third year, volunteered to guide a Junior Achievement team of high school students. The project aimed to establish a small business over a few months, providing young minds with firsthand business experience. Their entrepreneurial venture: selling fruit baskets. The students would purchase bulk fruit, arrange it into attractive baskets, and deliver them to homes in the community.
However, the experience was not without its complications. The Junior Achievement program imposed several rules to safeguard against financial mismanagement, including a particularly daunting guideline: the prohibition of any debt. While the rationale behind this rule was sound, enforcing it practically proved to be a considerable obstacle.
The dilemma quickly became apparent: without the ability to incur any liabilities, how could the team finance their fruit purchases? They found themselves in a classic catch-22; they needed funds to buy the fruit but couldn’t create any debts to acquire those funds.
Their solution? To cleverly turn this rule on its head by requiring customers to prepay for the fruit baskets. By collecting payments at the time of order and promising delivery weeks later, they were able to navigate the constraints imposed by Junior Achievement. From a functional business perspective, their strategy was indeed effective.
However, this is where things took an interesting turn into ethical ambiguity. As part of their responsibilities, the associates were tasked with preparing weekly financial reports to submit to the Junior Achievement office. Identifying the discrepancy in their cash collections and liabilities was crucial; revealing the true state of their finances could invite scrutiny from the organization.
Unintentionally, they found themselves maintaining two sets of financial records. One set was the “real” books, used internally to track payments and ensure orders were fulfilled; the other was a sanitized version prepared for the regional office’s review. As the weeks rolled by, the associates—and the eager students they were coaching—developed this dual Bookkeeping system, fully aware of its implications yet choosing to continue for the project’s duration.
Reflecting on this intriguing chapter in their professional journeys, the associates couldn’t help but chuckle at the ironic reality of keeping two sets of books in the name of education. It was a temporary, albeit ethically murky, solution that brid
No responses yet