The Ethical Dilemma: A Tale of Double-Entry in Mentorship
In the realm of professional ethics, we often find ourselves grappling with decisions that blur the lines between right and wrong. Today, I’d like to share an amusing yet thought-provoking story from my own experience that highlights the complexities of ethics in the workplace.
A few years ago, a group of my colleagues, all second and third-year associates, came together to volunteer as mentors for a Junior Achievement team comprised of high school students. The goal was simple: guide them in setting up and operating a small business for a couple of months. Our ambitious project? Selling fruit baskets—a concept that sounded wonderful on paper.
The challenge arose, however, from stringent regulations imposed by Junior Achievement. Their framework prohibited the business from taking on any debt or liabilities. While such rules make sense to protect the nonprofit organization, they posed quite a conundrum in practice. After all, how were we supposed to procure fruits and baskets without an upfront budget?
In a brainstorming session, we stumbled upon a creative workaround: we would require customers to prepay for their fruit baskets. This method enabled us to operate without incurring any formal debt, as we collected the money upfront and delivered the products weeks later. From a business perspective, this strategy thrived.
And here’s where the narrative takes a humorous turn. One of our responsibilities involved preparing weekly financial reports for submission to the Junior Achievement office. The reality was that by recording our cash collections and deferred revenue, we would trigger an uproar from the organization. Yet, maintaining accurate records was crucial for us to track orders and deliveries.
In our pursuit of compliance coupled with a need for operational clarity, we inadvertently created two sets of financial books—one for our internal use and a sanitized version for external review. To our surprise, we eventually realized that our budding entrepreneurs were in on the secret too. We had the “accurate” records for our own needs and a polished version for the eyes of the Junior Achievement auditors.
This dual-Bookkeeping practice continued for about three to four weeks until, during a casual discussion, we all acknowledged the ethical peculiarities of our actions. Realizing that our project was nearing its conclusion, we figured it was best to ride it out rather than complicate matters further.
Looking back, this experience served as a light-hearted reminder of the ethical complexities we often navigate in our careers. It raises questions about transparency, accountability, and the lessons we impart
No responses yet