Will Accountants Resist If I Use Non-Standard Bookkeeping Software?
I recently came across a discussion about someone managing their Bookkeeping with Excel. The consensus was to avoid them as a client because they don’t use a mainstream tool like QuickBooks.
Our point of sale (POS) software is a niche product with built-in general ledger functionality, used by only a few hundred people in our specific industry. At the end of each day, sales, cost of goods sold (COGS), and inventory accounts are automatically updated. The software also features an integrated accounts receivable (AR) module. New inventory acquisitions automatically generate journal entries for inventory and accounts payable (AP), with vendor invoices appearing in the AP.
Although the software lacks built-in payroll support and requires manual journal entries for payroll, it is otherwise a comprehensive solution. Generating income statements and balance sheets is straightforward and efficient. The software significantly reduces data entry time since most transactions are posted to the ledger automatically. Switching to QuickBooks would mean more time spent on routine Bookkeeping tasks.
Considering this setup, I’m curious if accountants are likely to resist working with me because I don’t use conventional bookkeeping software. The Excel discussion made me wonder if choosing this approach might make me a less desirable client.
One response
Using a non-standard Bookkeeping software can indeed lead to some pushback from accountants, and there are several reasons for this. However, whether this turns into a significant issue depends on several factors, including the complexity of your business operations, the functionality of your current system, and your accountants’ flexibility and experience.
Potential Challenges
Familiarity and Expertise:
Integration:
Support and Updates:
Considerations for Minimizing Pushback
Documentation and Training:
Assess Core Functionalities: