Title: An Unexpected Challenge: Understanding Depreciation in Corporate Finance
In the intricate world of corporate finance, we often assume that all leaders are equipped with a fundamental grasp of key Accounting principles. However, a recent experience at my company has illuminated an unexpected gap in the understanding of one of our newest executives.
Just six weeks ago, we welcomed a new finance Director to our team. With a remarkable background that includes over 20 years in corporate finance, a prestigious MBA, and experience at a Big Four firm, her credentials suggested a wealth of knowledge and expertise. I report directly to her as a senior accountant, and I was eager to collaborate.
However, during a routine walkthrough of our monthly close process, I encountered a remarkable revelation about her grasp of financial fundamentals. She posed a rather perplexing question about depreciation expenses. “Why do we waste money each month on depreciation when we’re not actually spending anything?” she asked, seemingly unaware of the foundational role this concept plays in financial reporting.
Initially, I thought it was a light-hearted test of my knowledge. I proceeded to explain that depreciation is vital in distributing the cost of assets over their useful lifespans, which aligns expenses with the revenue generated from these assets. Instead of recognition, I was met with a blank stare and a follow-up question: “But we already paid for the equipment. Why are we expensing it again?”
In an effort to clarify, I referenced basic Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and presented the relevant journal entries. To my surprise, she requested a step-by-step breakdown, insisting the process was “unnecessarily complicated.” It was astonishing to find myself explaining principles that are typically covered in introductory Accounting courses.
Furthermore, when discussing a new $50,000 server acquisition, she questioned why we couldn’t simply expense it for an immediate tax advantage instead of spreading the cost over time. As I elaborated on capitalization thresholds and the distinctions between assets and expenses, she suggested we consult with our tax advisor, casting doubt on established accounting practices.
Adding to the intrigue, she seemed genuinely shocked when I explained why our cash flow statement didn’t align with the Profit and Loss statement. I found myself reiterating that net income and cash flow are distinct measurements, a core concept vital for financial analysis.
These conversations have left me pondering how someone with two decades in finance could overlook such basic, yet crucial, principles. It raises questions about prior roles she may have held—were they less demanding in terms of financial oversight
No responses yet