The Surprising Gap in Expertise: A Cautionary Tale from the finance Department
Recently, our company welcomed a new finance Director, a seasoned professional boasting over 20 years in corporate finance, an impressive Big 4 background, and an MBA from a renowned institution. As a senior accountant and her direct report, I had high hopes for our collaboration. However, a series of perplexing interactions has left me questioning her fundamental understanding of finance.
Just yesterday, while guiding her through our monthly closing procedure, she posed an unexpected question: why do we incur depreciation expenses monthly if we’re not actually spending any money? Initially, I assumed this was a test of my knowledge, but as I began to explain the principle of depreciation—how it allocates the cost of tangible assets over their useful lives to align expenses with the revenue generated—I was met with a blank stare. She genuinely could not grasp why an asset that’s already been purchased would incur an expense on our financial statements.
Despite my attempts to elaborate on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), she insisted that the whole concept seemed “unnecessarily complicated.” I spent about half an hour covering principles that one might consider foundational knowledge in Accounting 101, yet her confusion only deepened.
The situation took another turn when she wondered why we couldn’t simply expense a $50,000 server purchase in the current fiscal year to optimize our tax position, rather than spreading the cost over several years. I explained the rationale behind capitalization thresholds and the distinctions between assets and expenses, but she suggested that we consult with our tax advisor because her intuition suggested something was amiss.
To top it off, she is responsible for reviewing our financial statements for accuracy before they are presented to the board next week. This is quite concerning, considering we’re a manufacturing company with annual revenues of around $15 million; this isn’t a small startup where one might expect a more casual approach to Accounting practices.
Furthermore, she expressed confusion about why our cash flow statement did not match the profit and loss statement. When I clarified that net income does not equate to cash flow, I was met with further skepticism.
It’s hard to believe that someone could navigate 20 years in the finance industry without comprehending these essential concepts. This raises serious questions about her previous roles—was she simply coasting in positions where others managed the detailed work, or is there a troubling trend of inflated resumes in the finance sector?
As we navigate this challenging period, the importance of foundational knowledge in finance cannot be
No responses yet