Title: A Surprising Challenge: Navigating Misunderstandings in Financial Fundamentals
In recent weeks, our company has welcomed a new finance Director with an extensive background that many would consider impressive—over two decades in corporate finance, experience with a Big 4 firm, and an MBA from a reputable institution. As a senior accountant reporting directly to her, I was optimistic about her leadership. However, a situation has arisen that has left me both bewildered and concerned.
While guiding her through our monthly financial close process, a conversation about depreciation took an unexpected turn. She questioned why we “waste money every month on depreciation expenses when we’re not actually spending anything.” At first, I assumed she was challenging my understanding of the topic, or perhaps conducting a test. I took the opportunity to clarify that depreciation is a method of spreading the cost of an asset over its useful life, a vital concept that aligns expenses with the periods benefiting from those assets. Unfortunately, her response was nothing short of a blank stare accompanied by the assertion, “But we already paid for the equipment. Why are we expensing it again?”
When I referenced Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and detailed the journal entries that reflect depreciation, I was met with a request to break it down even further—her confusion indicated that we were discussing something as foundational as Accounting 101 principles. The conversation didn’t stop there; she also inquired about the possibility of expensing a new $50,000 server all at once for an immediate tax deduction, rather than capitalizing it over time. Despite my efforts to explain capitalization thresholds and the necessary distinctions between assets and expenses, she suggested verifying this with our tax advisor, expressing doubt about its validity.
To make matters even more perplexing, she is tasked with ensuring the accuracy of our financial statements before they are presented to the board next week. This situation raises significant questions, especially considering that our company is a manufacturing entity generating $15 million in revenue—a scale that typically necessitates a strong grasp of Accounting practices.
Adding to my astonishment, she also asked why our cash flow statement did not align with the profit and loss statement, showing genuine confusion when I clarified that net income is not synonymous with cash flow.
This experience has prompted me to seriously reconsider how someone could thrive in finance for so long without being conversant in these essential concepts. It’s possible that she may have been fortunate to work in roles where the intricacies were overlooked, or perhaps there’s an issue
No responses yet