Monthly Transaction Classification: Insights and Billing

Understanding Transaction Volume and Billing Structure

In the realm of financial services, the volume of transactions processed each month forms a critical part of operational efficiency and accurate billing. In our case, we’re responsible for processing approximately 22,000 transactions monthly, which translates to a billing of around $23,000. This provides a benchmark as we assess our service efficiency and pricing strategy.

Our clientele requires detailed general ledger and class breakdowns for each transaction, which limits the extent of automation possible in our processes. Here’s a rundown of the services we provide:

Accounts Receivable Reconciliation: Managing discrepancies between two distinct systems.
Accounts Payable (A/P): Streamlining payment processes.
Asset Journaling and Depreciation: Accurate documentation and assessment of asset value.
Payroll Journaling: Ensuring payroll transactions are recorded properly.
Asset and Liability Reconciliation: Comprehensive Accounting of all financial responsibilities.
Monthly Client Meetings: Conducting one financial meeting per client each month.

Additional Insights

Our operations, conducted in USD, require two dedicated employees who invest a total of 250 hours each month to complete these tasks.

By sharing our figures and methods, we hope to open a dialogue about efficiency and appropriate billing practices in the finance industry.

When evaluating the efficiency and pricing model of your transaction processing and classification services, it’s important to consider both the volume of transactions you’re handling and the overall service you provide. Based on the details you shared, here’s a breakdown of your current operations:

Monthly Transaction Processing Overview

Transaction Volume and Revenue:
Total Transactions: 22,000 per month
Monthly Billing: USD 23,000
Complexity of Services:
Your clients require detailed General Ledger (GL) and class breakdowns, which limits automation potential and may require more manual intervention.
Services Included:
Accounts Receivable (A/R) reconciliation between two systems
Accounts Payable (A/P) processing
Journaling of assets and depreciation
Payroll journaling
Reconciliation of all assets and liabilities
One financial meeting per client each month
Labor and Resource Management:
Total Man Hours: 250 hours per month
Number of Employees: 2
Location Considerations:
This information is presented in USD, indicating that you are either operating within the United States or billing clients in USD.

Efficiency and Pricing Analysis

To determine the efficiency and appropriateness of your current pricing structure, you might consider the following factors:

Cost Per Transaction:
Your current billing translates to approximately USD 1.05 per transaction (USD 23,000 / 22,000 transactions).
Value of Service:
Apart from transactional work, the services you provide (like reconciliation, meetings, etc.) add significant value. This value should be reflected in your pricing.
Hourly Efficiency:
The 250 hours worked by 2 employees indicate that each employee is dedicating about 125 hours per month to these tasks.
At USD 23,000 per month, you’re effectively billing USD 92 per hour (USD 23,000 / 250 hours).
Comparison to Industry Standards:
It’s important to compare your cost per transaction and hourly rates with industry standards to ensure they’re competitive while still reflecting the value provided.
Scope for Automation and Optimization:
Given the requirement for detailed GL and class breakdowns, minimizing manual work might be challenging. However, exploring additional automation opportunities or

One response

APAdmin

26 February 2025 at 2:44 PM
When evaluating the efficiency and pricing model of your transaction processing and classification services, it’s important to consider both the volume of transactions you’re handling and the overall service you provide. Based on the details you shared, here’s a breakdown of your current operations:

Monthly Transaction Processing Overview
1. Transaction Volume and Revenue:
2. Total Transactions: 22,000 per month
3. Monthly Billing: USD 23,000
4. Complexity of Services:
5. Your clients require detailed General Ledger (GL) and class breakdowns, which limits automation potential and may require more manual intervention.
6. Services Included:
7. Accounts Receivable (A/R) reconciliation between two systems
8. Accounts Payable (A/P) processing
9. Journaling of assets and depreciation
10. Payroll journaling
11. Reconciliation of all assets and liabilities
12. One financial meeting per client each month
13. Labor and Resource Management:
14. Total Man Hours: 250 hours per month
15. Number of Employees: 2
16. Location Considerations:
17. This information is presented in USD, indicating that you are either operating within the United States or billing clients in USD.
Efficiency and Pricing Analysis

To determine the efficiency and appropriateness of your current pricing structure, you might consider the following factors:
1. Cost Per Transaction:
2. Your current billing translates to approximately USD 1.05 per transaction (USD 23,000 / 22,000 transactions).
3. Value of Service:
4. Apart from transactional work, the services you provide (like reconciliation, meetings, etc.) add significant value. This value should be reflected in your pricing.
5. Hourly Efficiency:
6. The 250 hours worked by 2 employees indicate that each employee is dedicating about 125 hours per month to these tasks.
7. At USD 23,000 per month, you’re effectively billing USD 92 per hour (USD 23,000 / 250 hours).
8. Comparison to Industry Standards:
9. It’s important to compare your cost per transaction and hourly rates with industry standards to ensure they’re competitive while still reflecting the value provided.
10. Scope for Automation and Optimization:
11. Given the requirement for detailed GL and class breakdowns, minimizing manual work might be challenging. However, exploring additional automation opportunities or
Log in to Reply

How Many Transactions Do You Classify Per Month?

Latest Comments