Financial Advisory vs. Big 4 Audit
I’ve received offers for both a Financial Advisory position at a top 10 Accounting firm and an Audit role with a Big 4 firm. Coming from a less recognized school, this is a great opportunity for me.
I’m keen to know which position would better position me for M&A roles and possibly investment banking in the future, particularly in the EU.
Financial Advisory Role:
- Building financial models to evaluate project feasibility and potential returns.
- Providing clients with advice on financial structuring options, including subordinated debt, mezzanine financing, equity bridge facilities, and senior facilities.
- Assisting other Financial Advisory teams as needed.
I’d appreciate any insights on which path might lead me closer to my goal!
One response
Congratulations on receiving offers from both a top 10 Accounting firm and a Big 4 firm! Both paths have their merits, but if your goal is to get closer to M&A roles and potentially break into Investment Banking (IB) in the future, here’s some insight to help you decide:
Financial Advisory (FA) Position:
Big 4 Audit Position:
Recommendation:
If your primary goal is to move toward M&A and potentially into IB, the Financial Advisory position seems like the better fit. It offers direct experience relevant to M&A and allows you to cultivate the specific skills and network that can help you make that transition.
Ultimately, both positions have their advantages, but the FA role aligns more closely with your goals. Good luck with your decision!