Bath vs. UCL for Mathematics: Are They Good Options? (UK)
I’m planning to pursue a degree in mathematics starting this October, with the goal of entering the quant field afterward. I’m curious if Bath and UCL are competitive enough for this path. Should I consider reapplying to institutions like Imperial, Warwick, or Oxbridge, given my achieved A-Level grades? I didn’t apply to Imperial or Warwick initially, and I was unfortunately rejected from Oxbridge after the interview stage. Any advice would be appreciated!
One response
Both Bath and UCL are reputable universities with strong mathematics programs, and they can certainly provide a solid foundation for a career in quantitative finance. UCL, in particular, has a well-established reputation in the field of mathematics and is located in London, giving it additional connections to the finance industry.
That said, if you are specifically aiming to break into quantitative roles, schools like Imperial, Warwick, and Oxbridge (Oxford and Cambridge) are often seen as more prestigious in this field. They have strong links to the finance sector and are highly regarded by employers, particularly in quant and investment banking roles.
Since you have already achieved strong A-Level grades, it could be worth considering reapplying to these schools, especially if you feel confident about improving your application based on your previous experience. However, keep in mind that competition is extremely high for those institutions, and being rejected from Oxbridge post-interview suggests that some factors in your application may need further strengthening.
Ultimately, it depends on your career goals. If you are set on working in quant, aiming for a top-tier university might give you an edge. However, if you do choose to go with Bath or UCL, be proactive in seeking internships and networking opportunities during your studies, as practical experience can significantly bolster your employability in quant roles.