New Finance Director doesn’t understand depreciation… I’m not joking

Title: A Deep Dive into Depreciation: Lessons from Our New finance Director’s Confusion

As a seasoned finance professional, one would expect a certain level of understanding from a newly appointed finance Director, especially one boasting an extensive background that includes over 20 years in corporate finance, a Big 4 pedigree, and an MBA from a reputable institution. However, my recent experiences in the workplace have compelled me to share a rather shocking revelation about our new director’s grasp of foundational Accounting principles.

Approximately six weeks ago, our company welcomed this new Finance Director, and I, as a senior accountant, have the responsibility of reporting directly to her. Just yesterday, during a typical walkthrough of our monthly close process, I encountered a curious moment that left me both perplexed and concerned for the future of our financial reporting.

She posed a rather surprising question: “Why are we wasting money every month on depreciation expenses when we aren’t actually spending anything?” Initially, I assumed this was a test of my knowledge, but as I began explaining the rationale behind depreciation—how it allocates the cost of an asset over its useful life to align expenses with the revenue generated—I was met with a puzzled expression.

Despite my efforts to clarify, explaining that depreciation is a core principle of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), she still seemed unconvinced. Her follow-up question, regarding the treatment of our new $50,000 server, revealed further misunderstandings. She wondered why we couldn’t simply expense it right away to capitalize on a tax write-off instead of amortizing it over time. It was disheartening to see that even with my explanation of capitalization policies and asset classifications, she was skeptical enough to suggest we “check with the tax guy” for further clarification.

As if that moment weren’t enough to raise eyebrows, she later inquired why our cash flow statement didn’t perfectly align with our Profit and Loss (P&L) statement. It was surprising to see her genuine confusion as I explained that net income and cash flow are distinct concepts, each serving different purposes in financial reporting.

This realization not only raises questions about her qualifications but also casts a shadow over our upcoming financial statement review, which is scheduled for presentation to the board next week. It’s bewildering to think someone could navigate the finance world for two decades without a firm grasp of these fundamental concepts.

For further context, our organization is a sizeable enterprise, generating $15 million in revenue within the manufacturing sector—far from the informal

Tags:

Categories:

No responses yet

Leave a Reply